Wood v. Burns
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.
This is a suit in equity to vacate a deed conveying land for that it is fraudulent and void, as to creditors, and to have the land subjected to the payment of the grantor’s debts.
There was a general demurrer to the bill for want of equity. Such a demurrer, Under section 6553, Code, tests defects in substance, and all proper amendments are considered to have been made. Whiteman v. Taber, 203 Ala. 496, 83 So. 595; Kyser v. American Surety Co., 213 Ala. 614, 105 So. 689; Russell v. Holderness, 216 Ala. 95, 112 So. 309.
While such is the interpretation of the Code section cited above, its effect…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Whiteman v. TaberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Kyser v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lauderdale County Board of Education v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Caudle v. CottonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. MarlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Massey v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- City of Clanton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.