Martin v. Baines
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN J.
(after stating the facts as above). The amendment to the bill relates to the same transaction between the same parties, and the motion to strike was properly overruled. Code 1923, § 6558; Birmingham Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Oden, 164 Ala. 1, 51 So. 240.
Rule 10 of Chancery Practice, cited by appellant,, provides that:
“Bills which contain blanks are defective, and may be ordered to be taken off the file.”
However, the fact that^ a bill contains blanks does not render it demurrable, unless the omitted averment is essential to the equity of the bill. As the rule indicates, it may be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Mead v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- King v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Blythe v. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Klepac v. FendleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Wiley v. MurphreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.