Nolen v. Henry
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Tallapoosa Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Wi-iiteside. Bill by R. L. Henry against Roy Nolen, to correct the description in a deed. From a decree overruling demurrers, to the bill, respondent appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Bill filed for reformation of description in certain deeds, referred to therein.- — Woodlawn Realty, etc., Co. v. Hawkins, 186 Ala. 234, 65 South. 183. Complainant claims title through a corporation known as Big Hillabee Power Company. It is shown: That one J. H. Chisolm, who was the owner of the land, conveyed by deed of date May 19, 1909, in execution of which deed his Avife, Rebecca Chisolm, joined, to said Big Hillabee Power Company a tract of land consisting of 10 acres, to be laid off so as to include a certain shoal on Big Hillabee creek known as “Lindsey Shoal.” That said Chisolm…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Meyer Bros. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Pollard v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- O'Neal v. SeixasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Lindsay v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Homan v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Sapp v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Hoffman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Clipper v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.