Legal Opinion

Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. Administrator

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 23, 1996No. 15372PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The dispositive issue raised in this appeal is whether, for the purposes of eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, the provision of art courses by the plaintiff, Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society,1 constitutes an activity within its usual course of business. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court in which the court held that the employment security board of review (board) had properly concluded that the plaintiff had failed to prove that the claimant, Karen Perrella,2 was employed as an independent contractor under the provisions of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Oller v. Oller-ChiangSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Taminski v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Pacific Indemnity Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API