Legal Opinion
Berger v. Tonken
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 3, 1984No. 11641PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the employment security board of review has a statutory obligation to provide unemployment compensation claimants with free transcripts of the proceedings before an appeals referee whenever the referee’s decision is appealed to the board of review.
The plaintiffs, Brian Berger, Paul Maciejak and Kathleen Crawforth, claimed unemployment compensation benefits, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-240, and each was determined, after a hearing before an appeals referee, to be ineligible for the benefits claimed. Each plaintiff appealed the referee’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc. v. MikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. George B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.