Legal Opinion
Acro Technology, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 25, 1991No. 9321PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
An employment security appeals referee upheld the administrator’s award of unemployment compensation to the claimant. The employment security board of review (board) affirmed and adopted the referee’s decision. The Superior Court reversed the board’s decision and the defendant administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act (administrator)1 appealed from that reversal.
The appeals referee, at a de novo hearing on the appeal from the administrator’s decision, found the following facts that were adopted by the board. The plaintiff, Aero Technology, Inc., employed the claimant, Beatrice Brophy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Savage v. AronsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Howell v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
3Cited by27 opinions
- Thompson v. Christiana Care Health SystemSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Town of Canterbury v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Crescimanni v. Department of Liquor ControlConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- 7-Eleven v. Administrator of Unemployment, No. 123480 (Jul. 14, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.