Legal Opinion
Crimmins v. Simonds
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1981No. 17186PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
Defendants appeal from a decree permanently enjoining them from operating a beauty salon in their home in violation of a restrictive covenant. Defendants challenge the appropriateness of the injunction on the facts of this case.
In 1962, the then owners of Plat C in the Upland Terrace Subdivision of Tooele City executed a Restrictive Covenants Agreement which was duly recorded with the Tooele County Recorder. The agreement stated in part:
NO TRADE OR BUSINESS PERMITTED: No trade or business of any kind or nature shall be permitted to be carried on upon any lot in said Plat C of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Peters v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Lewis v. Pingree Nat. BankUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Metropolitan Investment Company v. SineUtah Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Hagemann v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Swenson v. EricksonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Jensen v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.