Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1982No. L80-0849, CA 18891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is a suit to enjoin defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ 1 use of a roadway which passes across defendants’ property. The trial court found that plaintiff was the owner of an easement on the roadway across defendants’ property and granted him an injunction preventing defendants from interfering with his use of the roadway and costs. We review de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

The parties own adjacent parcels of land in Douglas County. In 1954, defendants’ predecessors in interest executed an instrument granting plaintiff an easement for ingress and egress over the roadway across…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chastang v. ChastangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  2. Bernards v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Laurance v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  5. POWERS ET UX. v. Coos Bay Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Seven Lakes Development Co. v. MaxsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Slak v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Cotsifas v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. HudspethCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API