Legal Opinion

Swaggerty v. Petersen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1977No. 75-5432, SC 25007PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This suit arises out of a dispute over the meaning of the density provisions of certain subdivision building restrictions. All of the parties own property within the subdivision. The plaintiffs contend that two houses built by defendant are in violation of the applicable building restrictions. The trial court agreed and ordered the houses removed. Defendant appeals, contending that the restrictions have not been violated; that if they have been violated, the plaintiffs have waived their right to complain or are estopped to do so; and that, in any event, plaintiffs’ remedy should have been…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Frankland v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Crawford v. SenoskyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Tauscher v. AndrussOregon Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. MeienbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Gladstone v. GregoryNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Collins v. GoetschHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API