Frensemeier v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Lloyd Frensemeier brings this interlocutory appeal challenging the denial of his motion to suppress. Specifically, Frensemeier argues that the police officers acted improperly in ordering hospital personnel to draw blood from him when a sheriffs deputy believed that he had operated a vehicle while intoxicated because the deputy smelled alcohol on his *160breath and noticed that his eyes were bloodshot at the scene of an accident. Concluding that the results of the blood tests are admissible in a prosecution against Frensemeier for driving while intoxicated,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Robert Trimble v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Shultz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Edwards v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PollmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. FoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Howard B. Gutenstein v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Meister v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.