Legal Opinion
State v. Foy
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2007No. 68A05-0605-CR-235PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
The State charged Robert Foy with murder. Foy filed a motion to suppress, which the trial court granted. Foy cross-appeals and raises the following restated issues:
1. Did the' trial court err in granting the State’s belated motion to file an interlocutory appeal?
2. Was the warrant supported by probable cause?
The State appeals and presents the following restated issue:
3. Did the trial court err in granting Foy’s motion to suppress?
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The following account comes largely from Stephen McCord’s, an investigator with the Randolph…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- United States of America, in 81-2838 v. Howard U. Johnson, in 81-2839Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Jaggers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SpillersIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Best v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- State v. LewisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- David Wise v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Buchanan ex rel. Buchanan v. VowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Kevin Shawn Carter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.