Legal Opinion

Robert Trimble v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2006No. 40S01-0602-CR-64PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a police officer receiving a credible report of a violation from an identified concerned citizen may properly enter onto private property through the normal route of access to investigate. Once there, publicly viewable evidence of a crime may properly be seized without a warrant, particularly when there is a need to act promptly to protect the health or safety of another, whether human or animal.

Factual and Procedural Background

"Butchie" is a miniature Doberman Pinscher belonging to Vera Wilcox. The defendant, Robert Trimble, agreed to care for Butchie when Vera…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Hardister v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. EichlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Rush v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API