Legal Opinion

Litchfield v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2005No. 50S03-0408-CR-382PublishedCited by 381 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a search of trash recovered from the place where it is left for collection is permissible under the Indiana Constitution, but only if the investigating officials have an articulable basis justifying reasonable suspicion that the subjects of the search have engaged in violations of law that might reasonably lead to evidence in the trash. '

Factual and Procedural Background

Beginning in' approximately 1999, the federal Drug Enforcement Administration had been providing the Indiana State Police with information subpoenaed from companies that advertised in High Times, a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by381 opinions

  1. Holder v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Douglas A. Guilmette v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

376 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API