Legal Opinion
State v. Hobbs
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 21, 2009No. 19A01-0904-CR-187PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court's sua sponte order excluding from evidence fruits of a warrantless search of James S. Hobbs IV's ("Hobbs") vehicle and the subsequent dismissal of the charges of possession of marijuana 1 and possession of paraphernalia, 2 both as Class A misdemeanors, filed as a result of that search against Hobbs. The State presents the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court erred by finding that the war-rantless search of Hobbs' vehicle, conducted subsequent to his arrest inside his place of employment on an outstanding…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- State of Indiana v. Raymond P. ColemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Jonah Long v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010