Johnson v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 10, 1908, after a hearing upon stipulated facts, affirming a reassessment upon property for a local improvement.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This appeal is from an order of the lower court affirming a reassessment made by the city council upon property benefited within a local improvement district in the city of Seattle. The facts are stipulated. It appears therefrom that, in 1904, the city of Seattle, by ordinance, provided for the paving of Harvard avenue and Harvard avenue north. The property benefited was designated as Improvement District No. 902. The streets were paved as provided, and an assessment roll was prepared by the city engineer, who assessed the lots benefited back to one hundred and twenty feet from the streets.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Young v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Lester v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- East Hoquiam Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Beezley v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Hapgood v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.