Legal Opinion

East Hoquiam Co. v. City of Hoquiam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1916No. 13222PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Grays Harbor county, Irwin, J., entered September 15, 1915, confirming an assessment roll, upon appeal from the city commission.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment affirming the order confirming a reassessment roll prepared by the city commission of Hoquiam, a city of the second class, reassessing, among others, certain lands belonging to the appellants. A former assessment was set aside by the superior court upon the grounds that the assessment had been made upon a fundamentally wrong basis and that the property of these appellants had been assessed in excess of the benefits. On the appeal to the superior court from the reassessment roll, the appellants introduced no evidence on the question of benefits, save the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Schuchard v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People ex rel. Keeler v. RobertsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. In re Shilshole AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Port of Tacoma v. ParosaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Eggerth v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In re Local Improvement AssessmentsWashington Supreme Court · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API