Kuehl v. City of Edmonds
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Alston, J., entered May 27, 1914, in favor of the plaintiffs, setting aside a reassessment on appeal from the order of the city council confirming the roll.
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Ellis, J.
In 1909, the city of Edmonds, a city of the third class, provided by ordinance for the improvement of Dayton street. An assessment roll was made assessing the property benefited for the full cost of the improvement, amounting to $8,317.33. At the suit of Peabody and others, the superior court enjoined the collection of the assessment for any greater amount than $4,375.75. The city appealed, and in Peabody v. Edmonds, 68 Wash. 610, 123 Pac. 1018, *197we found that the estimated cost of the improvement was $6,025.75. Following the case of Chehalis v. Cory, 54 Wash. 190, 102…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Seattle v. KelleherSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Frederick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Fisher v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Perry v. Island Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Eggerth v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Olson v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.