Legal Opinion

Beezley v. City of Astoria

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

It must be apparent that when the City failed to answer the complaint filed by the plaintiffs to quiet their titles, the City admitted only that it had no interest or estate in the plaintiffs’ properties. Section 516, Or. L. provides:

“Any person claiming an interest or estate in real estate not in the actual possession of another may maintain a suit in equity against another who claims an interest or estate therein adverse to him, for the purpose of determining such conflicting or adverse claims, interests, or estates.”

In Burton v. Huma, 37 Fed. 738, a discussion for the purpose of suits to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. In re Westlake AvenueWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Union Cent. Life Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  5. Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gwynn v. WilhelmOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Greenberg v. LEEOregon Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API