Legal Opinion

Odom v. Cedar Rapids Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 9, 1926No. 16359PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

J. B. Odom executed and delivered his five several promissory notes of $55 each, payable to the Seranado Manufacturing Company, which sold them to the Cedar Rapids Savings Bank. The notes were not paid when due, suit was brought in the county court of Carter county by the Cedar Rapids Savings Bank, praying judgment on the notes, and alleging that it purchased the notes from the Seranado Manufacturing Company in due course for value prior to maturity and that it was at the date of the commencement of the action the owner and holder thereof. The defendant filed his verified answer, admitting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Foster v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hyatt v. Vinita Brass WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. McAlester v. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Eldridge v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Beard v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. City of Ardmore v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API