Legal Opinion

Beard v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1929No. 19003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is an action brought by W. T. Rawleigh Company in the district court of Stephens county against W. E. Beard, J. B. Cate, and Ed Martin, to recover on a written agency contract and bond. The contract was executed by defendant Beard, and under the terms thereof certain merchandise was consigned to him for sale, the proceeds arising therefrom to b'e remitted to plaintiff.

At the time suit was filed defendant Beard was indebted to plaintiff in the. sum of $1,-393.13. Defendants Cate and Martin executed a bond to plaintiff guaranteeing faithful performance of the contract.

The sureties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. McAlester v. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Odom v. Cedar Rapids Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. National Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. CateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. National Mutual Casualty Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Young v. Union Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API