Legal Opinion

McAlester v. Bank of McAlester

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1923No. 12048PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was brought by defendant in error to recover -on a promissory note executed by plaintiff in error. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered for defendant. Plaintiff filed motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the court set aside the verdict and rendered judgment for the plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.

It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the court, in the absence of special findings, is without jurisdiction to enter judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McLaughlin v. YinglingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Farmers' Bank of Roff v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Barnes v. Universal Tire Protector Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Myrick v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Bartels v. SuterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Eldridge v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Odom v. Cedar Rapids Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API