St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
W. J. Bell secured a judgment against the railway company based upon damages sustained in personal injuries resulting from negligene'e of “defendants, their agents, servants and employees” at a time when he was a passenger for hire and was attempting to alight at his destination from a passenger coach of the defendant railway company at the. town of Aylesworth. E. M. Schwartz, the conductor, in charge of defendant’s train, was joined as a defendant, but judgment was rendered in his favor.
Bell boarded the train at Madill,. having paid passage to Aylesworth, and sat in the rear end of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. BeatieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Kurn v. ManleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.