Legal Opinion

St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1928No. 18393PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

W. J. Bell secured a judgment against the railway company based upon damages sustained in personal injuries resulting from negligene'e of “defendants, their agents, servants and employees” at a time when he was a passenger for hire and was attempting to alight at his destination from a passenger coach of the defendant railway company at the. town of Aylesworth. E. M. Schwartz, the conductor, in charge of defendant’s train, was joined as a defendant, but judgment was rendered in his favor.

Bell boarded the train at Madill,. having paid passage to Aylesworth, and sat in the rear end of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Gas Utilities Co. v. BeatieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. EakinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. CrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Kurn v. ManleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API