Madison v. McNeal
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
.Holcomb, J.-
These two causes were, by stipulation, consolidated for trial in the lower court and for hearing in this court. They involve a controversy over the right of the Madisons to a portion of certain waters produced by springs and dammed upon the property of McNeal and Wyatt, and to an alleged easement in the pipe lines used in the delivery of such water.
The first entitled action is an assertion of the rights to the water and easement, premised upon prescription and also upon a permit issued and granted by the state supervisor of hydraulics. The second action is an appeal to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmitz v. KleeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Funk v. BartholetWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Miller v. Lake Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Strawberry Water Co. v. PaulsenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Department of Ecology v. United States Bureau of ReclamationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.