Legal Opinion

Miller v. Lake Irrigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1902No. 3917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Chelan County. — Hon. Jesse P. Houser, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Suit to quiet right to water. Philip Miller and nine others joined as plaintiffs, claiming water by appropriation from Stemilt Creek, in Chelan county. The allegation of right in the complaint is as follows:

“That plaintiffs are the owners in fee simple and in possession of the first right to divert, for irrigation, stock, and domestic purposes, from Stemilt Creek, situated in the county of Kittitas, now Chelan, Washington, four hundred inches, miner’s measure, under a six-inch pressure of the waters of said creek.”

It is then alleged, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Longmire v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Offield v. IshWashington Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madison v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. United States v. Ahtanum Irr. Dist.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1954
  3. Spring Hill Irrigation Co. v. Lake Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Barnes v. BelsaasWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Miller v. Lake Irrigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API