Legal Opinion

Department of Ecology v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1992No. 57563-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The Washington State Department of Ecology (Department) granted to J.M. Hanson a permit to appropriate water from a stream running across his property. Hanson's property is located within the boundaries of a federal irrigation project and the stream carries, at least in part, water that the project diverted from the Columbia River pursuant to the federal government's own rights of appropriation.

A federal agency and three irrigation districts appealed the Department's action to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), arguing that the permit interfered with the federal government's prior…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ide v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Rock Creek Ditch & Flume Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schuh v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hillis v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API