Legal Opinion

Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1901No. 3048PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. James Gr. McClintow, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by ■

Anders, J.

The respondent moves to strike appellant’s brief in this case for the alleged reasons: (1) That appellant has failed to print in his brief the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the lower court; and (2) that appellant has also failed to refer in his brief to the record by page, as required by the rules of this court. Rule 8 of this court provides that briefs shall contain a clear statement of the case, so far as deemed material by the party, with reference to the pages of the transcript for verification; and that in equity…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinchman v. Point Defiance Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Keating Implement & Machine Co. v. Marshall Electric Light & Power Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. In re the Appeal of the Des Moines Water Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Madison v. McNealWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Vaughan v. KolbOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Liberty Lake Sewer District No. 1 v. Liberty Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Dunsmuir v. Port Angeles Gas, Water, Electric Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API