Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Short

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1940No. 27985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was brought by Alberta Low Thompson and Herrick B. Thompson, her husband, for the purpose of obtaining an injunction permanently restraining Martha Short, William F. Dolling and wife, and Al Moultrop and wife, defendants, from cutting off, interfering with, or molesting in any way the rights of plaintiffs in and to the use of the water from Little Mud creek, or the ditch (known as the Short ditch) which diverts the water from the creek.

Plaintiffs’ claimed rights, as shown by their complaint, are based upon a certain contract made and entered into in April, 1917, by and between…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Farm Investment Co. v. CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Rogers v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tremblay v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Rowe v. SilbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Rodríguez v. AlbizuSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  3. Washington Water Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Spokane Tribe of Indians, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Batey v. BateyWashington Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API