Jasperson v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiffs are partners doing business under the name of Whittlesey Cranberry Company and their compensation insurer. The defendants are James Peterson, a trucker, his compensation insurer, and Emmerick, who1 was an employee of either the Cranberry Company or Peterson and was injured in the course of his employment. The commission found that. Emmerick was an employee of the Cranberry Company (hereinafter referred to as the “company”), and ordered compensation to be paid by them and their insurer. The circuit court confirmed the award. Plaintiffs claim that he was an employee of Peterson,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Kohler Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.