Tesch v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The perusal and consideration of the record in this case in the light of other cases recently before the court has led us to reconsider some of the essential features of the workmen’s compensation act (ch. 102, Stats.), especially those regarding the determination of questions of fact.
*619The act (sec. 102.18) requires that after final hearing the commission shall make and file (1) its findings upon all the facts involved in the controversy, and (2) its award, which shall state its determination as to the rights of the parties.
The act (sec. 102.23) also provides that the findings of fact made by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Maeder Steel Products Co. v. ZanelloOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Village of Weyauwega v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Habrich v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Mallinger v. Webster City Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.