St. Mary's Congregation v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.
The issue on this appeal is whether Zacha-rias at the time of his injury was an employee of the Congregation or an independent contractor.
This court has repeatedly held that the principal test for determining whether the relationship of employer and employee exists is whether the alleged employer has the right to control the details of the work. Phaneuf v. Industrial Comm. (1953), 263 Wis. 376, 378, 57 N. W. (2d) 406; Thurn v. La Crosse Liquor Co. (1951), 258 Wis. 448, 46 N. W. (2d) 212; Hume v. Industrial Comm. (1945), 248 Wis. 5, 20 N. W. (2d) 573; and Fritz v. Industrial Comm. (1935), 218…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Fruit Boat Market v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Thurn v. La Crosse Liquor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Shawley v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Scholz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Wagner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Szep v. RobinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.