Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ray

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 2000No. CX-81-1120PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent-Harry N. Ray is currently suspended from the practice of law after being twice disciplined by this court. See In re Ray, 452 N.W.2d 689 (Minn.1990) {In re Ray II); In re Ray, 368 N.W.2d 924 (Minn.1985) {In re Ray I). The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a new petition for disciplinary action against Ray and a supplemental petition, alleging that Ray. has continued to engage in the practice of law while under suspension. A referee appointed by this court recommends disbarment. We agree with that recommendation and order disbarment.

Harry…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Application of ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrigsbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against HarriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against JaegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API