Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Jaeger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2013No. A12-1184PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Hugh D. Jaeger. The petition alleges that Jaeger engaged in the unauthorized practice of law while suspended for professional misconduct, failed to provide the required proof that he notified his clients of his suspension, and failed to cooperate with several disciplinary investigations in violation of Rules 3.4(c), 5.5(a) and (b), 8.1(b), and 8.4(d) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as Rules 25 and 26 of the Rules on Lawyers Professional…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disciplinary Action Against LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0055128Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re KlotzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST James Carl DUCHON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 029925XSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re Disciplinary Action Against RuffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.