Legal Opinion
Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of Art
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 19, 1987No. C8-86-2110PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Relator Mary Holbrook challenges a determination by the Department of Jobs and Training that she voluntarily quit, without good cause, her job with respondent Minnesota Museum of Art. We reverse.
FACTS
The Minnesota Museum of Art hired Mary Holbrook in October 1981 to work 15 hours per week as a curatorial assistant. At the time she was hired, Holbrook held a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota 1 and had finished the necessary class work for a Masters degree in the classics area. She had a background in research and library work.
During Holbrook’s first…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Hanson v. I. D. S. Properties Management Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & TypewriterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Forsberg v. Depth of Field/FabricsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.