Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
The issue in this appeal is whether the record reasonably supports the decision of the Commissioner of Economic Security, in reversing the appeal tribunal, that Dixie A. Marty voluntarily discontinued her employment without good cause attributable to her employer and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.09, subd. 1(1) (1982). Because we conclude it does not, we reverse.
Dixie A. Marty was first employed by Digital Equipment Corporation (Digital) in 1977. Digital had a written personnel policy. Section 6.04…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- RESERVE MIN. CO., BABBITT DIV. v. GoreckiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- Goodwin v. BPS Guard Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of ArtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Polley v. Gopher Bearing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.