Legal Opinion

Dachel v. Ortho Met, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1995No. C0-94-2096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Relator Wayne Daehel challenges the Commissioner’s decision that he quit his job without good cause and was thus disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. 1 We affirm.

FACTS

Relator was a five year employee of respondent Ortho Met, Inc., where he was ultimately promoted to the position of end process inspector, with a wage of $10.67 per hour. His latest position required precision and attention to detail. Based on its dissatisfaction with the quality of relator’s work, the employer told relator that he would be demoted to a production line position…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Lisa Marz v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Rootes v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Hein v. PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Wendy Bronstad, Relator v. The House of Hope, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API