Legal Opinion
Cook v. Playworks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1996No. C8-95-1207PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The Commissioner’s representative found that respondent Corey Cook quit his job for good cause attributable to relator Playworks, his employer, thus qualifying respondent for reemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 268.09 (1994). Relator employer contends that this finding erroneously disregards evidence and findings that the respondent, who quit due to a demotion and an accompanying pay cut, was given the new job assignment because of his inability to adequately perform in his previous position. We reverse and remand, concluding that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Williams v. RIGHT STEP ACADEMY (CORP)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Cook v. PlayworksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Mary D. Isaacson, Relator v. The Anthem Companies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.