Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
Relator Brian Sinykin appeals the Department of Economic Security’s determination that he was not eligible for a trade readjustment allowance pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2495 (1994), because he was not separated from employment due to a lack of work. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator Brian Sinykin was employed by Nordic Track from October 19, 1996, until April 10, 1998. His last position with Nordic Track was as a telephone sales representative. He worked 32 hours a week at a base pay of $11.38 per hour with an additional $1.00 per hour for working the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of ArtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nelson v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005