Legal Opinion

Sinykin v. Commissioner of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1999No. C2-98-2254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge. *

Relator Brian Sinykin appeals the Department of Economic Security’s determination that he was not eligible for a trade readjustment allowance pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2495 (1994), because he was not separated from employment due to a lack of work. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Brian Sinykin was employed by Nordic Track from October 19, 1996, until April 10, 1998. His last position with Nordic Track was as a telephone sales representative. He worked 32 hours a week at a base pay of $11.38 per hour with an additional $1.00 per hour for working the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Talberg v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marty v. Digital Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Holbrook v. Minnesota Museum of ArtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Commissioner of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API