Kormuth v. United States Steel Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Arnold,
Plaintiff appeals from the decree of the court below dismissing his bill in equity whereby he sought to enjoin an alleged continuing trespass by defendants.
The facts found by the chancellor, and fully supported by the evidence, are:
In 1902 the Luse heirs, owners in fee, conveyed to the Monongahela River Consolidated Coal and Coke Company all of the coal of the Pittsburgh seam in and underlying some 300 acres of their land “together with . . . right of way into, upon and under said land at sueh points and in such manner as may be proper and necessary for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Commonwealth v. FitzmartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Webber v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Clearfield Development Corp. v. Devonian Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- International Salt Co. v. GeostowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Shawville Coal Co. v. MenardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.