Legal Opinion

Waldman v. Shoemaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1951No. Appeal, 96PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Plaintiffs brought an action in assumpsit upon a written contract to recover $18,000. which they alleged defendants expressly and unequivocally contracted to pay them as soon as all the turkeys mentioned in the agreement were sold. Tlie defendants alleged that the parties entered into a joint business venture; that the plaintiffs were to be paid $18,000. if the venture was a financial success; that unfortunately the venture resulted in a loss, and therefore no money was due the plaintiffs. The Court entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Walker v. SaricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Robinson v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Security Trust Co. v. StappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. In Re Pch Associates, F/k/a Simon Associates, Debtor. Liona Corporation, N v. V. Pch AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API