Shawville Coal Co. v. Menard
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellant’s complaint against appellee.
In Bollinger v. Palmerton Area Com. Endeavor, Inc., 241 Pa.Super. 341, 350, 361 A.2d 676, 680 (1976), we stated:
[I]n passing upon a motion for summary judgment, “it is no part of our function to decide issues of fact but solely to determine whether there is an issue of fact to be tried and all doubts as to the existence of a genuine issue as a material fact must be resolved against the party moving for summary judgment. Schacter v. Albert, 212…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Ritmanich v. Jonnel Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Condemnation by Cty. of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Olbum v. Old Home Manor, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Gioia v. GioiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- PBS Coals, Inc. and Penn Pocahontas Coal, Co. v. Comwlth of PA, DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Pennesi, R. v. DL Resources, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2026