Legal Opinion

Clearfield Development Corp. v. Devonian Gas & Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1956No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

In this action of assumpsit founded upon written contracts, defendant appeals from judgment entered for plaintiff upon the pleadings.

Prior to entering into these contracts, defendant had leased from the Commonwealth certain lands for production of oil and gas. In compliance with a requirement of the lease, defendant had filed bond for performance and also had deposited with the bonding company as collateral the sum of $25,000.

Defendant had commenced drilling operations when it entered into the contracts with plaintiff. They recited that defendant was the “owner” 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Commonwealth v. Phila. & Erie R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Markides v. SofferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Kormuth v. United States Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Spatz v. NasconeDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Federal Rice Drug Company, a Corporation, in No. 19,540 v. Queen Insurance Company of America, a Corporation, in No. 19,541Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  4. Vosburg, III, A. v. NBC Seventh RealtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Vosburg, III, A. v. NBC Seventh RealtySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API