Legal Opinion

ROBINSON, LEATHAM & NELSON, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John M. NELSON, IV, Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 26, 1997No. 95-16604PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Robinson, Leatham & Nelson, Inc. (“RLN”), appeals the judgment as a matter of law in favor of John Nelson which took from the jury a major claim in a consolidated trial of multiple claims between the parties. The district court submitted RLN’s contract' claims to the jury, which found for RLN, and that judgment is not appealed. We review only the district court ruling against RLN’s breach of fiduciary duty claim against Nelson and the consequential removal from the jury of the punitive damages issue. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

RLN was formed when Nelson in 1988…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Heckmann v. AhmansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Lynch v. CookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Jess A. RodriguesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Iconix, Inc. v. TokudaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. In Re Real Estate Associates Ltd. Partnership LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Simpson v. BurrowsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2000
  5. Bravo Energy Trading, N.A. v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API