Legal Opinion
Bravo Energy Trading, N.A. v. Shell Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 2001No. 99-56900; D.C. No. CV-98-7023 RAP (Ex)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Bravo Energy Trading, N.A., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Shell Oil Co. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we will not detail them here except as necessary.
As to whether Bravo was undercompensated as a result of Shell’s negligence, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Bravo claims that the district court erred in not applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Findings of causation, or lack thereof, are reviewed for clear error. See Reber…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Woodworkers Tool Works v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni, a California Professional Corporation Edward M. Alvarez, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant. Ferrari, Alvarez, Olsen & Ottoboni, a California Professional Corporation Edward M. Alvarez, an Individual, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants v. The Home Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Harris v. Irish Truck Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Bedford v. ReCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Martinez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020