Legal Opinion

Iconix, Inc. v. Tokuda

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 26, 2006No. C 06-2201 SBA. [Docket Nos. 21, 82, 116, 130]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 21], Defendants’ Eviden-tiary Objections to the Declaration of Ronald Alepín and Jeff Wilbur [Docket No. 82], Plaintiffs Objections to Certain Evidence filed in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Strike [Docket No. 116], and Defendants’ Objections to New Evidence and Argument in Iconix’s Reply Memorandum [Docket No. 130],

BACKGROUND 1

Plaintiff Iconix, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Ico-nix”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Craigslist, Inc. v. NATUREMARKET, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. WeRide Corp. v. Kun HuangDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  3. IO Group, Inc. v. JordonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Whitewater West Industries v. AlleshouseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  5. Pure Wafer Inc. v. City of PrescottDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API