Legal Opinion

State v. Kenaitze Indian Tribe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1995No. S-6162PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

The issues in this case are whether the Alaska Constitution is violated by a statute which (1) requires the creation of areas in which permits for subsistence hunting and fishing may not be granted, and (2) grants priority hunting and fishing rights to a preferred class of subsistence users based on where they reside.

I. BACKGROUND

Since 1978, subsistence hunting and fishing has had statutory priority over sport and commercial hunting and fishing. 1 In practice, when a fish or game population is insufficient to supply all consumptive uses consistent with the sustained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Interior Alaska Airboat Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State, Department of Fish & Game v. ManningAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API