State v. Kenaitze Indian Tribe
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The issues in this case are whether the Alaska Constitution is violated by a statute which (1) requires the creation of areas in which permits for subsistence hunting and fishing may not be granted, and (2) grants priority hunting and fishing rights to a preferred class of subsistence users based on where they reside.
I. BACKGROUND
Since 1978, subsistence hunting and fishing has had statutory priority over sport and commercial hunting and fishing. 1 In practice, when a fish or game population is insufficient to supply all consumptive uses consistent with the sustained…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Interior Alaska Airboat Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- State, Department of Fish & Game v. ManningAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.