McDowell v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.
INTRODUCTION
This case challenges chapter 52 SLA 1986 which grants a preference to rural residents to take fish and game for subsistence purposes. The only requirement to be met by a subsistence fisherman or hunter is residency in a rural area of the state.
The rural preference is challenged under several provisions of the Alaska Constitution: the common use clause, article VIII, section 3; the no exclusive right of fishery clause, article VIII, section 15; the uniform application clause, article VIII, section 17; the equal rights clause, article I, section 1; and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. OstroskyAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ninilchik Traditional Council Jack Kvasnikoff, Jr. v. United States of America Bruce BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.