Legal Opinion

State v. Kenaitze Indian Tribe

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2004No. S-10358PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

After the Alaska Joint Boards of Fisheries and Game promulgated a regulation classifying the communities of Eklutna, Knik, and Ninilchik as nonsubsistence areas, the communities appealed to the superior court, which held that the regulation was invalid because it did not satisfy AS 16.05.258(c). Because we conclude that the joint boards, in promulgating the regulation, did not act arbitrarily and capriciously, we reverse the decision of the superior court, thus reinstating the disputed regulation. We also conclude that the joint boards did not err by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Alaska Survival v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hammond v. North Slope BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Osterkamp v. StilesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. DupierAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Kelly v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ross v. BaumanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API