State, Department of Fish & Game v. Manning
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
1. INTRODUCTION
Kenneth Manning was denied a Tier II subsistence permit for the 2000-2001 Nelchi-na caribou herd hunt. Manning brought suit, contending that certain aspects of the regulation governing the Tier II subsistence hunting permit point system discriminate against urban hunters in violation of state constitutional provisions requiring equal access to natural resources. Manning challenged three criteria in the regulation used to identify subsistence hunters eligible for the Nelchina caribou hunt: (1) access to alternative sources of game; (2) the cost of groceries;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ahtna Tene Nené v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Manning v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.