Legal Opinion

City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 2007PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

The City of Philadelphia (Employer) petitions for review of the April 9, 2007, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of workers’ compensation judge Joseph Hagan (WCJ Hagan) granting the penalty petition filed by Eugene Sherlock (Claimant) and, pursuant to section 435(d)(i) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 1 imposing a fifty-percent penalty against Employer. We affirm.

On September 10, 1997, Claimant sustained a work-related injury, and on March 25, 1998, Claimant filed a claim petition seeking benefits. Employer did…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Cohen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Gunter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Jordan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Allegis Group & Broadspire v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. National Fiberstock Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Zuchelli v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Kurpiewski v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Com. of Pa. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API