Legal Opinion

Gunter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 2003No. 37 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JUSTICE CASTILLE.

This Court granted review in this case to address the effect of the payment of injured on duty (“IOD”) benefits to a Philadelphia police officer, under authority of Philadelphia’s Civil Service Regulation 32, upon the City/employer’s right to oppose the police officer’s later petition for workers’ compen*388sation benefits. The Commonwealth Court held that the payment of IOD benefits is not the workers’ compensation equivalent of an employer issuing a notice of compensation payable (“NCP”) and, for that reason, held that the City could properly challenge the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Thompson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Cohen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Porco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Matticks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API